May 12, 2026 - Minutes of Public Meetings - Apprenticeship and Training Council
Council Members Present
Brian Cavey, Chairman
Neil Wilford, Jr., Employee Representative
Lateefah Durant, Public Representative
Brian Courtien, Employee Representative
Grant Shmelzer, Employer Representative
Minah Woo, Employer Representative
Stephanie Anderson, Employer Representative
Chris Hadfield, Employer Representative
Terreia Smalls, Employer Representative
Denise Gilmore, Employer Representative
(Absent Council Members: Beli Acharya, Public Representative; Ellen Flowers-Fields, Consultant; Jeanine Nagrod, Consultant; Martin Knott, Consultant; Tasha Cornish, Employer Representative; and Tracy Kyttle, Consultant)
Other Attendees
John Feaster, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Divisions of Workforce Development and Adult Learning (DWDAL)
Leza Griffith, Maryland Assistant Attorney General
Christopher D. MacLarion, Director, Office of Apprenticeship (OOA), MD Labor
Jane Sinclair, OOA, MD Labor
Logan Dean, OOA, MD Labor
Sheila Jackson, OOA, MD Labor
Karen Parker, OOA, MD Labor
Aneta Lefterov, OOA, MD Labor
Kevin Hunt, OOA, MD Labor
Pam Luby, OOA, MD Labor
Alicia Dennis, OOA, MD Labor
Marshel Pollock, OOA, MD Labor
Angela Harkness, OOA, MD Labor
Laura Wright, OOA, MD Labor
Rose Fish, OOA, MD Labor
Jennifer White, OOA, MD Labor
Coral Newland, OOA, MD Labor
Amy Belt, OOA, MD Labor
Ellie Marts, Division of Workforce Development and Adult Learning (DWDAL), MD Labor
Alan Crawley, MD Labor
Patty Shreves, Maryland Rural Water Association (MRWA)
Timothy Williams, Prince George’s Community College
Nancy Schwendeman, Worcester County Tourism
Stephanie Sarkes, Mid-Shore Community Foundation
Kerry Hester-West, Meritus Health
Richard Smith, Caliber Collision
Marcus McIntosh, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) Transit Police
Chuck Marquette, MD Labor
Jessica Troilo, Arcadia Living
Lisa Snyder, Recovery Resource Center
Robin Beote, United States Government
Kevin Bailey, Total Healthcare
Lynn Stone, Howard Community College
Mary Landreneau, Air-ON LLC
Ligia Reyes, Casa Ruben
Chuck Boughton, Total Healthcare
Miguel Duran, Pohanka Automotive
Dave Parker, Goodrich Fire & Life Safety
Adam Hanson, Wilmer Construction
Rachel Bonar, Tidal Health
Scott Mena, Pohanka Automotive
James Adams, Habitat for Humanity Choptank
Jonathan Smith, Choptank Electric Cooperative
Chris Wysocki, Rhinehart Railroad Construction
Sarah McDermott, LABS Group
Gabriel Van Tyk, Maryland Workforce Association
Alex Smith, Allied Well Drilling
Chairman Cavey called the meeting to order at 9:01 a.m. at Delaware Elevator, Inc., 2207 Allen Drive Salisbury, MD 21801.
Opening Remarks and Introductions
Chairman Cavey welcomed all Council members, staff and guests to the May Maryland
Apprenticeship and Training Council (MATC) meeting. The Chairman thanks Delaware Elevator for hosting the Spring MATC meeting and asked if Georgetta would like to say good morning.
Georgetta, from Delaware Elevators, welcomed and thanked everyone for attending. She gave her appreciation to be able to host the meeting again.
The Chairman recognized special guest that are in attendance the Assistance Commissioner of the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing Maryland Department of Labor Sarah McDermott and the Executive Director of Licensing Chuck Marguette. The Chairman asked everyone to introduce themselves.
Following introductions, The Chairman then turned the floor to Deputy Assistant Secretary Feaster to say a few words on behalf of the Division of Workforce Development and Adult Learning (DWDAL) and the Maryland Department of Labor (MD Labor).
Deputy Assistant Secretary Feaster wished everyone a good morning and welcomed them to the May Council meeting. He extended greetings from Secretary Portia Wu and thanked all for being in attendance and contributing to the expansion of quality Apprenticeships in Maryland.
Minutes of the March 10, 2026, Maryland Apprenticeship and Training Council (MATC) Meeting
The Chairman asked the Council if members had an opportunity to review the minutes from the previous meeting and they collectively confirmed that they reviewed the minutes in full.
A motion to approve the March 10, 2026, MATC minutes was made by Mr. Courtien, seconded by Mr. Wilford, and unanimously approved at 9:16 a.m.
Director’s Report
Mr. MacLarion addressed Chairman Cavey, Deputy Assistant Secretary Feaster, Council members and guests and welcomed everyone to the May 2026 MATC meeting. Mr. MacLarion recognized Delaware Elevator Inc. for hosting the MATC meeting five years in a row and thanked them for their hospitality.
Mr. MacLarion provided an update on the Apprenticeship Training Fund:
Total Fund Balance as of April 30, 2026, after all obligations is $666,407.40
March contributions: $18,996.67
April contributions: $90,268.48
Preliminary update for May contributions as of May 11th - $26,400.90
Mr. MacLarion also shared that Office of Apprenticeship (OOA) staff is working closely with the Division of Labor and Industry’s (DLI) Prevailing Wage team to audit contractors working on Maryland Prevailing Wage Projects. He said that they have
begun the process of auditing contractors working on those projects to ensure they are in compliance with the requirements to contribute to an approved Apprenticeship fund when working on eligible projects. 48 audits have been initiated, 27 audit reviews have been completed, 11 of the 27 reviews employers made corrections and made all required payments, 15 of the remaining 27 audits resulted in payments of over $210,000.00 to the Apprenticeship Training Fund. Remaining audits are ongoing and conditional audits are being scheduled.
Mr. MacLarion shared that Office of Apprenticeship (OOA) has been working closely with the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing and now are considered at 100% licensure for all apprentices in sheet metal, steam fitting, HVAC, plumbing and electrical occupations. As the OOA continues to work with Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing, the audit process is over and OOA will not accept new apprentices without proof of licensure nor will the apprentice graduation without holding the respected apprentice license.
Mr. MacLarion said that the agenda contains 11 new programs seeking registration of Standards of Apprenticeship. Mr. MacLarion said that OOA staff received some questions and feedback from Council members on a couple of items and that staff have made revisions to clarify information in the Standards and will address those questions when they present. He added that revised documentation was needed in some cases and explained that updated documents and clarifying information has been provided for Council members. He went on to share that a few of those programs, item 9 Sterile Technique Phlebotomy and CPR/First Aid School item 10 The Old Dominion Group, item 12 Goodrich Fire & Life Safety, and item 15 Congoleum Corporation Resilient Flooring Division will be moved to the agenda for the next meeting.
Mr. MacLarion shared that National Apprenticeship Week was held April 26, 2026, to May 2, 2026. He thanked all the programs that participated in making it a successful week. Maryland had the highest number of events in our region and the fourth highest in the country. Maryland was higher than Michigan, Illinois, and California, which is impressive compared to the geography and population of the larger states.
Mr. MacLarion congratulated Terreia Smalls from Plumbers & Gasfitters UA Local 5, whose apprentices won Apprentice of the Year award.
Mr. MacLarion shared that the current legislative session is over and three important bills have passed regarding apprenticeship. He gave a reminder that the bills have not been enacted yet but provided a short high-level review: Senate bill 964, the Maryland Workforce Apprenticeship Utilization Act, requires certain contractors and subcontractors on covered prevailing wage public works projects to utilize registered apprentices for a minimum of 20% of their total labor hours. As of January 1,2027, will require a completion rate of at least 25%. Senate bill 673 State Procurement Apprenticeship Program Accountability and Completion, requires apprenticeship programs that provide apprentices for specific contracts to maintain at least a 25% completion rate for a cohort in order for apprenticeship rate to be paid on a coverage project with prevailing wage.
Senate bill 509 Workforce Pell Grant lays groundwork for federal funding to utilize certain workforce
programs including registered apprenticeship. More information to include laws and regulations will be following in the next couple of months.
Mr. MacLarion provided an update at the request of the Council on a new and improved program on the Tustin Group program. OOA staff reviewed Tustin Group on January 13, 2026, as a result Council wanted to get back to the Sponsor regarding in person labs to ensure that they were occurring for the apprentices. Tustin Group is conducting labs in person for their apprentices and are planning on building two more in house labs, which are under construction. There is going to be a location in Montgomeryville, PA and Manassas, VA with a third with a sister company based in Maryland. OOA staff were satisfied with the review and how the Sponsor implements the related instruction.
Mr. MacLarion stated that the Maryland Apprenticeship Advisory Board will be meeting on May 20, 2026, at 10am. Anyone interested in joining may due so and the information can be found on the OOA website.
Mr. MacLarion then concluded his presentation and thanked the Chairman and the Council for their time. He also offered to answer any questions.
A motion to approve the Director’s Report was made by Mr. Shmelzer, seconded by Mr. Wilford. and unanimously approved (Beli Acharya, Public Representative; Ellen Flowers-Fields, Consultant; Jeanine Nagrod, Consultant; Martin Knott, Consultant; Tasha Cornish, Employer Representative; and Tracy Kyttle, Consultant were not present.).
The Chairman thanked Mr. MacLarion for his report and proceeded to the presentation of agenda items. He welcomed Apprenticeship Navigator, Lynn Stone, to the podium to present Agenda Item 1.
Old Business
Innovo Construction (Lynn Stone) – Request for registration of Standards of Apprenticeship for a new program for the occupation of Glazier. (ITEM 1)
Ms. Stone stated that she was joined by owner and general manager of Innovo Construction, LLC, to request the registration of Standards of Apprenticeship for the occupation of Glazier. She provided additional background information on Innovo Construction. Ms. Stone stated that the proposed program is a three-year time-based apprenticeship consisting of 6,000 hours of on-the-job training and 433 hours of related instruction. She explained that there would be no cost to the apprentice for participation in the program. Ms. Stone offered to answer any questions from the Council.
Mr. Shmelzer asked about the education requirements, specifically the language requiring apprentices to be able to read and interpret blueprints. Ms. Stone explained that the standards had been modified and that blueprint training would occur after the first year of
the apprenticeship.
A motion to approve this new program was made by Mr. Wilford, seconded by Mr. Hadfield and approved. Mr. Courtien abstained from the vote. (Public Representative Beli Acharya, Employer Representative Tasha Cornish, and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
New Business
New Programs
AG-CON, LLC (Jacqueline Trieu) – Ms. Trieu stated that she was joined by representatives from AG-CON, LLC to request the registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for the occupation of Operating Engineer. She provided additional background information on the program and occupation and offered to answer any questions from the Council.
Ms. Trieu stated that she was joined by representatives from AG-CON, LLC to request the registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for the occupation of Operating Engineer. She provided additional information regarding the program and occupation and offered to answer questions from the Council.
Mr. Wilford asked how a Louisiana-based company would employ apprentices in Maryland and if they have plans to stay in Maryland after the job is complete. The Sponsor explained that the company anticipates obtaining additional work opportunities in Maryland and currently performs work in other states, including Virginia. The Sponsor stated that projects generally range from six to nine months in duration. The Sponsor stated they like to hire apprentices who like to travel and are willing to work at the other job locations.
Ms. Anderson expressed concern regarding whether the Related Instruction for a three-year program would be Maryland-based if projects in the state only last approximately six months. The Sponsor explained that Related Instruction would consist of both virtual and in-person instruction, with some instruction occurring outside of Maryland.
Ms. Woo asked about travel requirements for apprentices. Ms. Trieu stated that apprentices may be required to travel for work assignments and that travel expenses, including hotel accommodation, would be covered by the employer when necessary. Ms. Woo questioned if the related instruction would be based all online. The Sponsor expressed that related instruction is both virtual and in-person with flexibility on the location due to where the job site is located.
Mr. Smalls asked how many apprentices currently participate in the program. The Sponsor stated the program was approved in September 2024 and at this time the program currently has two apprentices who are further along in the program and approximately 16 to 17 apprentices participating in programs located in other approved states. The Sponsor explained that Texas, Virginia, and Georgia currently have approved Registered Apprenticeship programs.
Mr. Shmelzer asked whether prevailing wage requirements would apply. The Sponsor confirmed that prevailing wage requirements would be followed when applicable and that positions would be advertised locally.
Mr. MacLarion discussed the options available to an employer who is participating on an inflation reduction project which includes establishing an individual Registered Apprenticeship program, joining an existing group program, or choosing not to participate in apprenticeship. Mr. MacLarion stated that Maryland currently does not have a non-union group apprenticeship program for the occupation and noted that employers who do not participate in apprenticeship programs may be unable to perform certain work opportunities.
A motion to approve this new program subject to a six-month review was made by Ms. Durant, seconded by Mr. Shmelzer, and approved. Mr. Courtien, Ms. Anderson, Mr.
Hadfield, and Mr. Smalls opposed the motion. (Public Representative Beli Acharya, Employer Representative Tasha Cornish, and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
Arcadia Living, LLC (Jacqueline Trieu) – Request for registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for a new program for the occupation of Certified Nursing Assistant. (ITEM 3)
Ms. Trieu stated that she was joined by Jessica Troilo representatives from Arcadia Living, LLC to request the registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for the occupation of Certified Nursing Assistant. She provided background information regarding the employer and stated that Arcadia Living operates in seven locations. Ms. Trieu stated that apprentices hired in location Anne Arundel would be required to have a vehicle to travel to work locations and Related Instruction at Chesapeake College. Ms. Trieu shared that Acadia Living will be looking to partner with other community colleges in the area. After successful completion of the one-year program, Apprentices have the opportunity to make
$45,000 annually as a journey worker.
The Chairman confirmed that Ms. Trieu stated the Apprentices must have a vehicle to travel.
Ms. Woo asked why Chesapeake College was being utilized as the Related Instruction provider for apprentices at the Anne Arundell locations. Ms. Trieu explained that Related Instruction would be provided through Chesapeake College and that apprentices could also attend Anne Arundel Community College. Ms. Trieu stated that clinical experiences would be completed on-site.
Ms. Woo discussed transportation concerns and potential support opportunities available to apprentices Discussion occurred regarding the requirement for apprentices to have a personal vehicle. Council members discussed revising the language from requiring a personal vehicle to requiring reliable transportation.
Ms. Durant asked whether there would be any cost to the apprentice. Ms. Trieu stated that there would be no cost to the apprentice for participation in the program.
Ms. Anderson asked that the school system names be specifically identified within the
standards and noted that the approved high schools should be listed on Appendix B. Ms. Trieu stated that the employer utilizes the Caroline County Public School System School-to-Apprenticeship program. The Sponsor shared that the goal is to leverage the School to Apprenticeship Program.
Mr. MacLarion shared the verbiage for School to Apprenticeship and use of approved School Systems is standard and acceptable for high school student apprentices. Adult apprentices would have to attend the college for related instruction.
Mr. Shmelzer noted that incentive funding opportunities are available to help sponsors leverage resources and support apprenticeship programs. That Sponsor should reach out to their local Apprenticeship Navigator for assistance.
Ms. Durant asked about the requirement of 2,000 hours for a program identified as competency based.
Prior to the vote, Ms. Gilmore asked whether there is enforcement of prevailing wage requirements. Mr. MacLarion explained that enforcement begins with requiring that apprentice wages meet at least the applicable minimum wage or county minimum wage, if higher. He stated that wage progressions must include at least one increase during the apprenticeship and must culminate at the established Journeyworker wage rate. He further explained that the Office of Apprenticeship cannot require sponsors to begin apprentices at 50 percent of the Journeyworker wage, although some programs utilize that starting rate.
Mr. MacLarion noted that if a contractor participating in a group program has a starting wage that falls below the applicable minimum wage, the wage progression must be adjusted until the apprentice wage meets or exceeds the required minimum wage.
Mr. MacLarion addressed Ms. Durant's concern regarding the competency-based structure of the program and the requirement of 2,000 hours. Mr. MacLarion explained that the program is a one-year, competency-based program with a minimum of 2,000 hours. He stated that work competencies may consist of individual job tasks and that sponsors may establish both the required competencies and a range of hours necessary to achieve those competencies.
A motion to approve this new program with the modification of changing the requirement from a personal vehicle to reliable transportation and adding Anne Arundel Community College as an approved Related Instruction provider was made by Mr. Shmelzer, seconded by Mr. Hadfield, and approved. Ms. Gilmore abstained from the vote. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Employer Representative Tasha Cornish; and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
Casa Ruben, Inc. (Aneta Lefterov) – Request for registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for new programs for the occupations of Medical Assistant and Certified Nursing Assistant. (ITEM 4)
Ms. Lefterov stated that she was joined by representatives from Casa Ruben, Inc. to request the registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for the
occupations of Medical Assistant and Certified Nursing Assistant. She provided background information regarding the employer. Ms. Lefterov stated that the apprenticeship programs are competency-based programs with a minimum of 2,000 hours and a one-to-one apprentice-to-journeyworker ratio. She explained that apprentices bear no cost for participation in the programs. Related Instruction will be provided in-house and consists of 200 hours for the Medical Assistant occupation and 144 hours for the Certified Nursing Assistant occupation. The starting wage for both occupations is $15.00 per hour.
Ms. Woo asked for clarification regarding the Journeyworker wage rate of $16.75. Ms. Lefterov confirmed that is the correct Journeyworker wage of $16.75 and $17.00.
Ms. Woo asked about the related instruction being conducted in-house. She wanted to know if the Sponsor was certified by MBON and if both programs end with a certification. Ms.
Lefterov and the Sponsor confirmed that they are certified, and both occupations end with a certification along with a pathway with University of Maryland who provides the Related instruction. The pathway is CNA, to CMA and nursing school is the apprentice chooses.
Ms. Woo questioned if MA was a required next step. The Sponsor stated that MA is not a required next step in the pathway.
Ms. Woo inquired if relation instruction/training credit was given to pursue the nursing school pathway. The Sponsor explained that no credit will be given because the occupations do not align with the University of Maryland degree pathway.
Mr. Smalls asked about the Journeyworker wage rate and whether the sponsor experiences a high turnover rate. The sponsor stated that it does not experience a high turnover rate and discussed opportunities for career advancement within the organization and the healthcare field.
Ms. Woo asked for clarification regarding the request to change from a group non-joint apprenticeship program to an individual sponsor program. Ms. Lefterov clarified that Casa Ruben, Inc. was previously approved as an individual sponsor on March 12, 2024, and that the sponsor was requesting approval to transition to a group program.
Ms. Woo asked how many apprentices had completed the program. The sponsor stated that one apprentice is nearing completion and that the organization plans to enroll four additional apprentices through the EARN grant. The sponsor also discussed partnerships with the Montgomery County coalition and the Prince George's County coalition, which is seeking to train approximately 17 apprentices.
Mr. Shmelzer asked what support systems were in place to improve apprentice retention. The Sponsor stated that nursing staff, human resources personnel, and mentoring supports are available to assist apprentices throughout the program. The EARN grant helps give the Sponsor the availability to have structure to focus on retention and nurturing of apprentices.
Mr. Smalls asked whether the sponsor relies upon outside organizations to support their infrastructure for the apprenticeship program. The Sponsor stated that internal staff provide support services and assist apprentices with retention and successful completion of the program.
Ms. Woo inquired whether a compliance review had been conducted since the program has been in existence for approximately two years. Mr. MacLarion responded that a compliance review had been completed and that the review went well. He stated that with the sponsor's one apprentice anticipated to complete the program later this month or next month, the sponsor currently has a one hundred percent completion rate.
Mr. MacLarion explained that it is common for nonprofit organizations to transition to a group apprenticeship program for sustainability purposes and that the use of grants to support program growth is encouraged. He stated that the long-term goal is for the program to grow to include 30 to 40 employers with hundreds of apprentices completing the program, similar to what has been achieved within the construction industry. He also stated that it is the hope that apprentices will continue along the healthcare career pathway, should they choose to do so.
Mr. Courtien asked whether this program serves as an example within the healthcare field of mapping career pathways and making entry-level occupations apprenticeable. Mr.
MacLarion confirmed that the occupations are entry-level positions within the medical field that may be obtainable without participation in a registered apprenticeship program. He stated, however, that apprenticeship provides a stronger framework to support apprentice success and career advancement. Mr. MacLarion further explained that while some apprentices choose to continue along the healthcare career pathway, others elect to remain in their current occupation. Mr. Wilford stated that he did not understand why an individual would choose to remain at that level given the low wage rates and expressed concern that the occupation could become a pathway to poverty rather than advancement. Mr. MacLarion reminded council that this is a pathway to a nurse and that we cannot control what the employer pays their employees.
Mr. Wilford asked whether the program functions more as a pre-apprenticeship program. He is concerned that the wages for apprentices are dropping instead of increasing. Mr.
MacLarion acknowledged that the increasing cost of living presents challenges and stated that the Office of Apprenticeship cannot control wages established by employers. He explained that as the healthcare industry expands its use of registered apprenticeships, there may be greater opportunities for apprentices to continue along the pathway into nursing and other healthcare occupations.
Ms. Woo stated that she understood Mr. Wilford's concerns; however, environmental and socioeconomic factors may influence an individual's career choices and advancement opportunities. She acknowledged that multiple educational and career levels must often be completed before advancement occurs. Ms. Woo requested that Labor consider conducting a study to examine Certified Nursing Assistant apprentices over time to determine whether they remain employed within the healthcare field and whether they advance along the career pathway; along with the band of wages. Mr. MacLarion responded that the individual programs tracking would be easier to find out if the apprentices is still employed compared
to those in a group apprenticeship program. In a group program the sponsor would have to contact each individual employer to inquire. Mr. MacLarion stated that it may be difficult to track or capture apprentices who relocate to another state. He stated that he was uncertain whether such a study would be feasible; however, he indicated that it was worth exploring to determine whether the information could be obtained. Mr. MacLarion requested that the Council allow staff until the next MATC meeting to further investigate the matter.
Mr. Courtien expressed concern that the registered apprenticeship system may appear to be promoting lower wages and stated that there is a disconnect between apprenticeship wages and living wages. He expressed that Registered Apprenticeship Programs have a duty to create a pathway to a career.
A motion to approve these new programs was made by Ms. Woo, seconded by Mr. Shmelzer, and approved. Mr. Wilford and Ms. Gilmore opposed the motion. (Public Representative Beli Acharya, Employer Representative Tasha Cornish, and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
Habitat for Humanity Choptank, Inc. (Jacqueline Trieu)– Request for registration of Standards of Apprenticeship for a new program for the occupation of Carpenter. (ITEM 5)
Ms. Trieu stated that she was joined by representatives from Habitat for Humanity Choptank, Inc. to request the registration of Standards of Apprenticeship for the occupation of Carpenter. She provided background information regarding the employer and the proposed apprenticeship program. Ms. Trieu explained that Habitat for Humanity Choptank is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization that utilizes volunteers to support its mission while also employing paid staff positions. Ms. Trieu stated that the Carpenter occupation is structured as a franchise model and will serve Dorchester and Talbot Counties. She stated that the sponsor currently employs four full-time Journeyworkers.
Mr. Shmelzer asked whether the sponsor employs paid Journeyworkers. Ms. Trieu confirmed that the sponsor employs paid Journeyworkers.
Chairman Cavey confirmed that the sponsor utilizes the School-to-Apprenticeship program and noted that apprentices as young as 16 years old may be working alongside Journeyworkers earning $19.00 per hour. Ms. Trieu confirmed that the Journeyworker wage rate is $19.00 per hour and it is a School to Apprenticeship program.
Prior to the vote, Mr. Wilford asked whether the apprenticeship program would expand into additional counties. The Sponsor described the organizational structure as being similar to a franchise model and explained that the proposed apprenticeship program will initially serve Dorchester and Talbot Counties, with possible future expansion into additional service areas.
The Sponsor stated that the program has identified opportunities for employees to continue along a career pathway and shared that carpenter training is nationally recognized. The
Sponsor explained that the apprenticeship program will develop apprentices who possess skills in both new home construction and the restoration of older homes. The Sponsor further stated that wages may continue to increase as apprentices advance within the industry and that the program serves as a starting point for a long-term career. The Sponsor confirmed that there are four paid journeymen.
A motion to approve this new program was made by Ms. Durant, seconded by Ms. Anderson, and approved. Mr. Courtien abstained from the vote. (Public Representative Beli Acharya, Employer Representative Tasha Cornish, and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
King's Kids Early Learning Center, LLC (Alicia Dennis)– Request for registration of Standards of Apprenticeship for a new program for the occupation of Child Care Professional. (ITEM 6)
Ms. Dennis stated that she was joined by representatives from King's Kids Early Learning Center, LLC to request the registration of Standards of Apprenticeship for the occupation of Child Care Professional. She provided background information regarding the employer and the proposed apprenticeship program. Ms. Dennis stated that the program would be an individual, non-joint apprenticeship program with a one-to-one apprentice-to-journeyworker ratio. She explained that there would be no cost to the apprentice for participation in the program. Ms. Dennis stated that Related Instruction would be provided fully online and discussed the Sponsor's oversight and monitoring of the Related Instruction.
Mr. Wilford expressed concern that the wage rate for the occupation was too low. Ms. Woo asked whether there was an approved Related Instruction provider since all
Related Instruction would be delivered virtually. Ms. Dennis explained that the Related
Instruction provider is Childcare Education Institute and discussed the methods the Sponsor would utilize to monitor apprentice progress and verify completion of the Related Instruction requirements.
A motion to approve this new program was made by Mr. Shmelzer, seconded by Mr. Hadfield, and approved. Ms. Anderson opposed the motion and Mr. Courtien abstained from the vote. (Public Representative Beli Acharya, Employer Representative Tasha Cornish, and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
Chairman Cavey shared that he recently attended a meeting in Annapolis where Ms. Dennis was recognized for her work. Mr. MacLarion thanked the Chairman and acknowledged that
he should have recognized Ms. Dennis during the meeting. He stated that Ms. Dennis received an award following a nomination submitted by Rachel Bonar of Tidal Health in recognition of her assistance with both Tidal Health’s Registered Apprenticeship and Youth Apprentices. Mr. MacLarion noted that it is uncommon for a state employee to receive such recognition outside of her ranks and congratulated Ms. Dennis on the achievement.
MedStar Health (Logan Dean)– Request for registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for a new program for the occupation of Certified Nursing Assistant. (ITEM 7)
Mr. Dean stated that he was joined by representatives from MedStar Health to request the registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for the occupation of Certified Nursing Assistant. He provided background information regarding the employer and the proposed apprenticeship program. Mr. Dean stated that the program is a group non-joint apprenticeship program that will be utilized by MedStar facilities. He explained that all Related Instruction will be provided by MedStar Health in collaboration with Baltimore City Community College. The apprenticeship program utilizes a one-to-one apprentice-to-journeyworker ratio, and there is no cost to the apprentice for participation in the program. Mr. Dean stated that the Journeyworker wage rate is $20.00 per hour and that the wage progression continues until certification, at which time the apprentice receives the full Journeyworker wage rate. He explained that the program is a one-year and three months, competency-based apprenticeship program.
Ms. Woo inquired whether the occupation requires front-loaded certifications prior to apprentices beginning work. Mr. Dean confirmed that there is some front-loading of certifications necessary for the occupation. The Sponsor stated that they are developing supplemental educational opportunities for apprentices and are also creating an orientation program to support participants entering the occupation.
Ms. Woo noted a discrepancy within the standards regarding the program length, with one section indicating one year and two months and another section indicating one year and three months. The Sponsor confirmed that the anticipated completion period is approximately one year and three months to complete the certification requirements.
Mr. Shmelzer asked whether Kerrie would be responsible for maintaining the documentation for the participating employers. Kerrie confirmed she would oversee the required documentation. Mr. Shmelzer reminded the Sponsor that they would return before the Council for a provisional review in one year. He also noted the importance of recruitment efforts focused on increasing male participation in the occupation, stating that the workforce is approximately 97 percent female.
A motion to approve this new program was made by Ms. Woo, seconded by Ms. Durant, and approved. Ms. Gilmore opposed the motion. (Public Representative Beli Acharya, Employer Representative Tasha Cornish, and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine
Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
Recovery Resource Center (Alicia Dennis)– Request for registration of Standards of Apprenticeship for a new program for the occupation of Certified Peer Recovery Specialist. (ITEM 8)
Ms. Dennis stated that she was joined by representatives from Recovery Resource Center to request the registration of Standards of Apprenticeship for the occupation of Certified Peer Recovery Specialist. She provided background information regarding the employer and the proposed apprenticeship program. It is an individual non-joint program, the ratio is one to one, and there is no cost to the apprentice. The Apprentice would have to self-identify lived experience in recovery. The Sponsor will use a three-step verification approach that is aligned with National Peer core standards.
Mr. Wilford asked about turnover within the occupation. Ms. Dennis responded that when the Sponsor initially approached the Office of Apprenticeship, there had been turnover within the occupation because the positions were volunteer-based. She explained that the Sponsor is utilizing paid positions and the apprenticeship program to improve retention and support long-term participation within the field.
Mr. Wilford expressed concern that many apprenticeship programs serve as pathways where individuals eventually move on to other occupations. The Sponsor shared several success stories and explained that all Certified Peer Recovery Specialists in Maryland work under a Registered Peer Supervisor. The Sponsor stated that Registered Peer Supervisors have either many years of recovery experience and/or possess a bachelor's degree in mental health. Apprentices work directly under the supervision of a Registered Peer Supervisor and are never assigned to work independently with clients.
The Sponsor explained that the goal of the program is to assist individuals in becoming Certified Peer Recovery Specialists and shared the success story of one of the Registered Peer Supervisors. The Sponsor stated that they have trained approximately 35 individuals during the past year and that the apprenticeship program will improve retention by allowing the occupation to become a paid position rather than a volunteer position.
Mr. Wilford inquired about the training requirements and how the training is delivered. The Sponsor stated that the training is provided through a combination of online and in-person instruction and that the Sponsor pays for an instructor to provide the required training.
A motion to approve this new program was made by Mr. Shmelzer, seconded by Ms. Woo, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya, Employer Representative Tasha Cornish, and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
Sterile Technique Phlebotomy and CPR/First Aid School (Angela Harkness)– Request for registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for a new program for the occupation of Phlebotomist. (ITEM 9)
This item was moved to the July 2026 meeting. No motion was taken on this item.
The Old Dominion Group (Angela Harkness)– Request for
registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for a new program for the occupation of Insulation Worker. (ITEM 10)
This item was moved to the July 2026 meeting. No motion was taken on this item.
Total Healthcare (Marshel Pollock) - Request for registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for the occupations of Medical Assistant and Community Health Worker. (ITEM 11)
Ms. Pollock stated that she was joined by representatives from Total Healthcare to request the registration of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for the occupations of Medical Assistant and Community Health Worker. She provided additional background information regarding the employer and the proposed apprenticeship programs.
Ms. Pollock stated that the programs are individual, non-joint, one-year competency-based apprenticeship programs with an Affirmative Action Plan. For the occupation of Medical Assistant, there will be 316 hours of Related Instruction provided by the Community College of Baltimore County, with 90 percent provided in person and 10 percent provided through virtual self-paced instruction. The occupation requires 2,000 hours of on-the-job training and has a Journeyworker wage rate of $25.00 per hour.
Ms. Pollock stated that the occupation of Community Health Worker includes 160 hours of Related Instruction provided by the Community College of Baltimore County. The Related Instruction will be provided 100 percent in person and includes 2,000 hours of on-the-job training with a Journeyworker wage rate of $22.00 per hour.
Ms. Pollock stated that apprentices bear no cost to participate in the programs and that the apprentice-to-journeyworker ratio is one-to-one. She explained that the Sponsor initially proposed recruiting apprentices from throughout Maryland and that Maryland residency would not be required. The standards were modified to state that the Sponsor will recruit from all areas and that participants are not required to be Maryland residents.
A motion to approve the new programs was made by Mr. Wilford, seconded by Ms. Anderson, and approved by the Council. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
Program Reactivations
Goodrich Fire & Life Safety (Karen Parker)– Request for reactivation with revisions of the apprenticeship program with an Affirmative Action Plan for the occupation of Sprinkler Fitter with the addition of School to Apprenticeship and the Standards onto the updated forms. (ITEM 12)
This item was moved to the July 2026 meeting. No motion was taken on this item.
Rhinehart Railroad Construction, Inc. (Amy Belt)– Request for
reactivation with revisions of the Standards of Apprenticeship with an Affirmative Action Plan for the occupations of Track Equipment Operator and Track Laborer. The revisions are the Standards onto the updated forms. (ITEM 13)
Ms. Belt stated that she was joined by Mr. Chris Rhinehart from Rhinehart Railroad Construction, Inc. to request the reactivation with revisions of the Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for the occupations of Track Equipment Operator and Track Laborer.
Ms. Belt stated that the sponsor is requesting reactivation of its individual non-joint, time-based apprenticeship program consisting of 4,000 hours of On-the-Job Training and 200 hours of Related Instruction per year for each occupation. She explained that Related Instruction is completed during paid work hours, is provided entirely in person, and is offered at no cost to the apprentice.
Ms. Belt stated that the program previously became inactive due to challenges retaining apprentices. As part of the revised Standards, the sponsor increased the Journeyworker wage rate to support apprentice retention and long-term participation in the program.
A motion to approve the reactivation of this apprenticeship program was made by Mr. Wilford, seconded by Ms. Anderson, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya, Employer Representative Tasha Cornish, and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
Program Revisions
Choptank Electric Cooperative (Jacqueline Trieu)– Request for revision of Standards of Apprenticeship to revise the Related Instruction for the occupation of Electric Line Repairer (Line & Power). (ITEM 14)
Ms. Trieu stated that she was joined by Nathan Smith and Paula Bishop representing Choptank Electric Cooperative to request revision of the standards of apprenticeship for
the occupation of Electric Line Repairer (Line & Power). She provided background information regarding the sponsor and the proposed revisions to the related instruction.
A motion to approve the revisions was made by Mr. Shmelzer, seconded by Mr. Cavey, and approved by the Council. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
Congoleum Corporation Resilient Flooring Division (Teresa Mena) – Request for revision of Standards of Apprenticeship to add the occupation of Millwright and to add a Related Instruction provider for the occupation of Stationary Engineer. (ITEM 15)
This item was moved to the July 2026 meeting. No motion was taken on this item.
Howard Community College (Sheila Jackson)– Request for revision of Standards of Apprenticeship to modify the Related Technical Instruction curriculum for the occupation of Surgical Technologist. (ITEM 16)
Ms. Jackson stated that she was joined by representatives from Howard Community College to request revision of the standards of apprenticeship for the occupation of Surgical Technologist. She provided background information regarding the sponsor and the proposed revisions to the Related Instruction curriculum. Ms. Jackson explained that the occupation includes 2,000 hours of on-the-job training. The revised curriculum provides four weeks of Surgical Technology Fundamentals as well as four weeks of Surgical Technology Applications. She stated that the revised curriculum will only be available to future cohorts and that apprentices currently enrolled in the program will complete the existing course of study.
Mr. Shmelzer asked whether all participating employers agreed with the proposed changes to the Related Instruction curriculum. Ms. Jackson confirmed that all participating employers agreed to the revisions.
A motion to approve the revisions was made by Ms. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Shmelzer, and approved. Ms. Woo abstained from the vote. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
Maryland Rural Water Association (Sheila Jackson)– Request for revision of Standards of Apprenticeship to modify Appendix D, Qualifications and Selection Procedures, Section III for the occupations of Water Systems Operation Specialist and Wastewater Treatment Operator. (ITEM 17)
Ms. Jackson stated that she was joined by Patty Shreves representing the Maryland Rural Water Association to request revisions to the Standards of Apprenticeship for the occupations of Water Systems Operation Specialist and Wastewater Treatment Operator. She explained that the original selection procedures were based on a point system and that the Sponsor would like to revise the selection procedures to utilize a first-come, first-served basis.
Mr. Wilford requested clarification regarding the first-come, first-served selection process and asked whether this meant that the Sponsor would no longer conduct interviews or administer an aptitude test. The Sponsor stated that there is not currently an aptitude test and explained that participating employers make all hiring decisions. The Sponsor shared that it conducts informational sessions and completes background checks and toxicology screenings, during which some individuals self-eliminate prior to being referred to employers.
Mr. Wilford also asked what size classes the Sponsor anticipates before enrollment is closed. The Sponsor explained that the participating employers determine the cohort size.
Ms. Anderson asked whether it is common for only the company president to participate in the selection process. Mr. MacLarion stated that this is not the most common practice but may occur with employers that have a limited number of applicants.
Ms. Gilmore asked what impact the revisions would have on incumbent workers. The Sponsor explained that apprentices are already employed by participating employers and that the Sponsor cannot place individuals with employers but may provide recommendations.
Ms. Durant asked how the proposed revisions would impact equity and access to the program. The Sponsor explained that the program serves employers throughout the entire state. Opportunities are initially offered to the first qualified applicant; however, if an applicant declines the opportunity, the position may be offered to other applicants throughout the state. The Sponsor further stated that it has participating employers located throughout Maryland, which provides opportunities for applicants in multiple regions.
Chairman Cavey confirmed that if an applicant declines an opportunity due to the location of the position within the state, the applicant is not removed from the applicant list and remains eligible for future opportunities.
Ms. Smalls stated that the Sponsor's opinion does not carry significant weight in the hiring process. The Sponsor agreed and explained that the participating employers make all hiring decisions and that the Sponsor only provides recommendations to employers.
A motion to approve the revisions was made by Mr. Shmelzer, seconded by Ms. Gilmore, and approved. Ms. Durant abstained from the vote. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
Pohanka Automotive Training Center (Alicia Dennis)– Request
for revision of Standards of Apprenticeship to modify the program from a time-based to a hybrid program with revisions to the Work Processes, Related Instruction, and Wage Progression Schedule for the occupation of Automotive Technician. (ITEM 18)
Ms. Dennis stated that she was joined by representatives from Pohanka Automotive to request revisions to the Standards of Apprenticeship for the occupation of Auto Technician. She provided background information regarding the employer and the proposed revisions to the apprenticeship program. Ms. Dennis explained that the occupation is currently a three-year, time-based apprenticeship program with a one-to-one apprentice-to-journeyworker ratio and no cost to the apprentice. The Sponsor is requesting to revise the program to a hybrid model with the intention of allowing advanced apprentices to complete the apprenticeship earlier based upon successful completion of competencies. The Sponsor also proposed introducing an intensified production plan beginning in the second year of the program. Current apprentices may continue under their original apprenticeship agreement or elect to participate in the revised program.
Ms. Durant requested clarification regarding the revised competency structure and wage progression. Ms. Dennis explained that first-year apprentices begin at $15.00 per hour with a maximum wage of $18.00 during the first year. During the second year, apprentices would be placed into wage brackets based upon their production levels. Apprentices who achieve 20 hours of production would move to the flat-rate wage of $23.00 per hour.
Ms. Durant asked how production is determined. The Sponsor explained that production is based upon the number of labor hours produced. The Sponsor stated that the automotive industry utilizes a flat-rate system in which each repair job is assigned a predetermined amount of time to complete the work. The Sponsor explained that the industry standard is approximately 60 hours of labor produced for every 40 hours worked.
Mr. Wilford expressed concern that an apprentice may wish to test out and advance to a higher level before the Sponsor believes they are prepared. The Sponsor responded that apprentices could request to advance; however, the Sponsor explained that they know their apprentices well enough to determine when they are ready to progress. The Sponsor stated that some apprentices currently approach them seeking additional opportunities and that they feel they may be holding some apprentices back under the existing structure, which is one reason for the proposed revisions. The Sponsor also shared that they offer additional classes and training opportunities, including incentives provided by various manufacturers.
A motion to approve the revisions was made by Ms. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Shmelzer, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
Prince George’s Community College (Lynn Stone)- Request for revision
of Standards of Apprenticeship to add School to Apprenticeship and add the occupations of Tax Advisor I and Tax Advisor II. (ITEM 19)
Ms. Stone stated that she was joined by Kimberly Williams, representative from Prince George’s Community College, to request revisions to the Standards of Apprenticeship to add School-to-Apprenticeship and the occupations of Tax Advisor I and Tax Advisor II. She provided background information regarding the proposed revisions. Tax Advisor I is a one-year, competency-based apprenticeship program consisting of 162 hours of Related Instruction. Tax Advisor II is a two-year, competency-based apprenticeship program consisting of 225 hours of Related Instruction.
Ms. Woo asked why the occupations were separated into Tax Advisor I and Tax Advisor II. Ms. Stone explained that Tax Advisor I is considered an entry-level occupation focused primarily on personal income taxes utilizing software such as QuickBooks and tax preparation software. Tax Advisor II requires additional competencies related to business tax preparation and more complex tax matters. Ms. Stone stated that apprentices may begin in Tax Advisor I and progress to Tax Advisor II; however, some individuals may prefer to remain focused solely on personal tax preparation.
Ms. Woo asked whether an apprentice could enter the program directly as a Tax Advisor II. Ms. Stone explained that apprentices may not enter directly into Tax Advisor II because Tax Advisor I serves as a prerequisite to the second occupation. Ms. Stone explained that individuals who only wish to perform personal tax preparation may remain at the Tax Advisor I level, while those wishing to expand into additional tax services may continue to Tax Advisor II.
Mr. Shmelzer asked whether there would be any apprentices currently participating in the occupation. Ms. Stone stated that these are new occupations and there are not currently any apprentices enrolled.
Chairman Cavey asked whether the proposal was improperly breaking apart a single trade into multiple occupations. Mr. MacLarion explained that the proposal does not constitute a splinter occupation because an individual may choose to remain at the Tax Advisor I level if that is the desired career path. He stated that it is acceptable for apprentices to complete Tax Advisor I without advancing to Tax Advisor II and that Tax Advisor I represents a distinct occupation rather than a subdivision of an existing trade.
Mr. Courtien stated that, in his opinion, this represents a single occupation and that an individual is either a Tax Advisor or is not. He expressed concern that the proposal separates one occupation into multiple levels.
Ms. Stone noted that there are two distinct certification pathways associated with the occupations. She explained that Tax Advisor I and Tax Advisor II require different competencies and certifications, which is the basis for establishing separate occupations.
Chairman Cavey noted that both occupations utilize the same O*NET code.
Mr. Smalls noted that individuals in the plumbing trade receive exposure to all aspects of the
occupation as part of their apprenticeship training and questioned whether the tax occupations should remain one program.
The Sponsor explained that the distinction between the occupations is the type of tax preparation being performed. Tax Advisor I focuses primarily on individual tax returns, while Tax Advisor II includes business tax preparation and more advanced tax services.
Mr. Wilford questioned whether approving the proposal as a single occupation would reduce cancellations if an apprentice chose not to advance to Tax Advisor II. He expressed concern that apprentices who do not wish to continue to the second level may result in program cancellations.
Chairman Cavey stated that he understood that an individual could complete Tax Advisor I and perform personal tax preparation without advancing further. However, he noted that within a registered apprenticeship program, apprentices typically continue through the program until they reach Journeyworker status. He expressed concern that if Tax Advisor II is required to achieve Journeyworker status, apprentices who wish to remain at the Tax Advisor I level may not complete the apprenticeship program.
Mr. Wilford commended the Sponsor for developing the career pathway and recognized the effort to create advancement opportunities within the profession.
Mr. Wilford made a motion, seconded by Ms. Gilmore, and further discussion continued. Mr. Wilford stated that he would like to modify the proposal to create a 6,000-hour program.
Chairman Cavey explained that such a modification would not constitute approval of the item as presented.
Mr. Wilford then amended his motion; however, he subsequently rescinded and withdrew the motion. Mr. Wilford asked whether, because both occupations utilize the same O*NET code, they should be considered one program and questioned whether creating a 6,000-hour program would resolve the issue. Ms. Stone noted that the proposed occupations are competency-based programs.
Mr. Wilford asked the Assistant Attorney General whether the proposed modification would be permissible. Assistant Attorney General Griffith stated that she was uncertain whether the modification would be permissible and expressed concern that combining the occupations could potentially delay an individual's ability to obtain a professional credential. She stated that she would further review the issue.
Mr. MacLarion stated that there is some overlap between the competencies of the two occupations. He explained that if the occupations were combined into a competency-based program with a maximum length of three years, a possible consequence would be an increased cancellation rate if apprentices only wished to complete Tax Advisor I. Mr.
MacLarion stated that the Council could also approve the occupations as presented and review how many apprentices continue from Tax Advisor I to Tax Advisor II during the provisional review period.
A question was raised regarding whether cancellations after completion of Tax Advisor I
would negatively impact the apprenticeship program. Chairman Cavey explained that cancellations occurring during the probationary period do not affect program performance. He noted that the probationary period is limited to 25 percent of the program.
Ms. Woo discussed reviewing how many apprentices advance from Tax Advisor I to Tax Advisor II to determine whether the occupations function as two distinct occupations.
Mr. Wilford questioned how the proposal differs from the hybrid model previously approved for Pohanka Automotive. Mr. MacLarion explained that the Pohanka program is a hybrid model with a range of hours and allows advancement upon completion of the required competencies and related instruction.
Mr. Wilford asked whether a hybrid structure would prevent the proposal from negatively affecting completion rates. Chairman Cavey stated that progression could be impacted by the timing and availability of college courses. Mr. MacLarion reminded the Council that the probationary period is limited to 25 percent of the program. He explained that for a one-year program, the probationary period is approximately three months, and cancellations occurring after the probationary period would affect the program's performance measures.
Mr. MacLarion suggested that the Council could conduct a provisional review within six to twelve months and a regular review within eighteen to twenty-four months to evaluate how apprentices progress through the occupations. He stated that if all apprentices advance from Tax Advisor I to Tax Advisor II, the occupations may function as a single occupation. However, if a majority of apprentices remain at Tax Advisor I and choose not to continue, the occupations may demonstrate that they are separate occupations.
Chairman Cavey stated that if the Council approves the occupations as separate programs, there is no mechanism to later combine them without additional action.
Mr. MacLarion explained that if the Sponsor later wished to combine the occupations, the Sponsor would be required to amend the Standards of Apprenticeship.
Mr. Wilford reiterated his concern that the proposal represents one occupation being divided into two occupations. He stated that he would be concerned about establishing a precedent that could result in other industries splitting occupations based upon individual job tasks.
Ms. Anderson stated that apprentices could receive the full training and later select the discipline or specialty area they wish to pursue within the profession.
Ms. Woo suggested that the Sponsor return to participating employers to discuss the Council's feedback and determine what the program would look like if the occupations were combined. The Sponsor explained that participating employers have indicated a need for Tax Advisor I apprentices who can begin performing tax-related duties while developing additional competencies. The Sponsor stated that there are currently two participating employers and additional employers are expected to join the program. The Sponsor indicated that approximately five apprentices are anticipated to begin the program in August. The Sponsor expressed concern that delaying action could postpone implementation of the program.
Mr. Shmelzer made a motion to approving Tax Advisor I to allow the Sponsor to begin the program and returning with Tax Advisor II at a later meeting. Chairman Cavey stated that approving Tax Advisor I separately would effectively split the occupation. He noted that if Tax Advisor II were later approved, or if it were never approved, the occupation would still have been divided into separate programs. Mr. MacLarion explained that the Council could not partially approve the proposal as presented.
The Sponsor stated that Tax Advisor I could be retitled simply as Tax Advisor. The Sponsor also noted that the two occupations utilize different Related Instruction curricula.
Mr. Wilford asked whether there is a separate ONET code specifically for personal tax advisors. Chairman Cavey stated that the ONET code utilized for the proposal is for Tax Preparer and includes several different occupational titles and specialties; however, they all fall under the Tax Preparer occupation.
A motion to table the request was made by Mr. Cavey, seconded by Mr. Shmelzer. Ms. Gilmore abstained from the vote. (Public Representative Beli Acharya, Employer Representative Tasha Cornish, and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (Lynn Stone)–
Request for revision of Standards of Apprenticeship for the Work Processes, Related Instruction, and Qualifications for Apprenticeship for the occupation of Police Cadet. (ITEM 21)
Ms. Stone stated that she was joined by Sgt. Charles Page and Marcus McInty representatives from the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, to request revisions to the Standards of Apprenticeship for the occupation of Police Cadet. She provided background information regarding the employer and the proposed revisions to the apprenticeship program. The occupation is an individual, non-joint apprenticeship program with a two-year term. The proposed revisions include modifications to the work process schedule and related instruction requirements.
Ms. Anderson expressed confusion regarding the Related Instruction language because the standards indicated that 30 percent of the Related Instruction is provided in person and 70 percent is provided virtually, while the Prince George's Community College portion of the Related Instruction is provided 100 percent through live virtual instruction.
Ms. Stone explained that the apprenticeship program contains two components of Related Instruction, consisting of instruction provided by the employer and instruction provided by Prince George’s Community College. She stated that the cumulative hours from both instructional components were combined to determine the total Related Instruction hours for the occupation.
A motion to approve the revisions was made by Ms. Woo, seconded by Mr. Shmelzer, and approved. Ms. Gilmore abstained from the vote. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and
Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
The Campaign for the Historic Trades (Jane Sinclair)– Request for revision of Standards of Apprenticeship to add the occupations of Traditional Mason and Traditional Roofing Technician and add additional Related Instruction providers to previously approved occupations of Preservation Carpenter, Historic Window Technician, and Deconstruction Technician. (ITEM 20)
Ms. Sinclair stated that she was joined by Jordan Smith and Natalie Davis White, representatives from The Campaign for the Historic Trades, to request revisions to the Standards of Apprenticeship. She provided background information regarding the organization and the proposed revisions to the apprenticeship program. Ms. Sinclair stated that the organization registered in Maryland in November 2023 and is also nationally registered. She noted that the program primarily operates in Maryland; however, apprentices may have opportunities to participate in projects in other states, including West Virginia, North Carolina, Virginia, Georgia, Colorado, Ohio, Illinois, New York, and Minnesota.
A motion to approve the revisions was made by Ms. Gilmore, seconded by Mr. Wilford, and unanimously approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
Program Reviews (5 or more Apprentices)
Allied Well Drilling, LLC (Pam Luby)– Request for approval of program review for a registered sponsor with 5 or more apprentices. (ITEM 22)
Ms. Luby stated that an in-person review of Allied Well Drilling, LLC was conducted on March 29, 2026. She noted that the Sponsor registered the apprenticeship program in 2024 and currently has 32 active apprentices working throughout the country.
Ms. Luby reported that apprentice records were reviewed and found to align with the approved Standards of Apprenticeship. She stated that all documentation reviewed was consistent with the Sponsor's standards. Related Instruction is held twice weekly, and the Sponsor provides laptops to apprentices to participate in the mandatory Related Instruction.
Ms. Luby stated that all apprentices are currently working outside of Maryland on prevailing wage projects. The Sponsor provided prevailing wage documentation and payroll records demonstrating that apprentices are being compensated in accordance with the approved wage progression contained within the Standards of Apprenticeship. She also noted that transportation is provided by the Sponsor to allow apprentices to return home when working away from home for extended periods of time.
Ms. Luby reported that the Sponsor remains underrepresented with regard to minority participation and currently has no female drillers participating in the program. She stated that the first cohort of apprentices is expected to complete the program in 2029. Ms. Luby further noted that the program maintains a low cancellation rate of approximately seven percent. Ms. Luby recommended that no further action be taken until the Sponsor's next two-year review.
Mr. Shmelzer stated that the Sponsor needs to continue outreach efforts to recruit women into the occupation. Ms. Luby explained that apprentices are often away from home for approximately ten months out of the year, which makes recruiting female apprentices more difficult, particularly for individuals with children. Mr. Shmelzer stated that despite those challenges, the Sponsor still needs to make an effort to recruit women into the occupation.
A motion to approve the program review was made by Mr. Wilford, seconded by Ms. Anderson, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
AUI Power, Inc. (Pam Luby)– Request for approval of program review for a registered sponsor with 5 or more apprentices. (ITEM 23)
Ms. Luby stated that a program review of AUI Power, Inc. was conducted on March 17, 2026. She reported that the Sponsor registered its apprenticeship program in September 2021 and added an Affirmative Action Plan in 2023. This was the Sponsor's second program review.
Ms. Luby reported that the Sponsor currently has 14 active apprentices. She noted that the initial report incorrectly reflected 24 active apprentices; however, the correction was made and the revised information was resubmitted. She stated that apprentice records were complete and up to date and that all apprentices were being paid in accordance with the approved wage schedule contained in the Standards of Apprenticeship.
Ms. Luby stated that two apprentice cohorts were reviewed. The 2022 cohort experienced a 100 percent cancellation rate, while the 2024 cohort had a cancellation rate of 32 percent. She further reported that the program remains underrepresented with regard to minority and female participation. Ms. Luby recommended that no further action be taken until the Sponsor's next two-year review.
Mr. Hadfield asked whether the Sponsor followed the Affirmative Action Plan. Ms. Luby responded no, the Sponsor hires all employees as incumbent workers.
Ms. Woo asked about the classifications of the incumbent workers. Ms. Luby stated that the classifications include Groundman.
Mr. Courtien asked about the Sponsor's Affirmative Action numbers and Equal Opportunity
Plan. He noted that if the Sponsor intends to utilize a particular method of recruitment and outreach, the Equal Opportunity Plan should accurately reflect those activities.
Chairman Cavey shared if Sponsor does not follow the requirements of the Affirmative Action Plan a letter should be issued.
Mr. MacLarion explained that the Sponsor is currently utilizing the general Equal Opportunity Plan template. He stated that if the Sponsor is operating as an incumbent worker program, there is a separate Equal Opportunity Plan provision specifically for incumbent worker programs. Mr. MacLarion stated that if the Sponsor intends to continue utilizing incumbent workers, the Sponsor would need to amend its agreements and return before the Council for approval to convert the program to an incumbent worker program.
Mr. MacLarion recommended that a letter be sent to the Sponsor recommending that the Equal Opportunity Plan be amended. He noted that although the Sponsor participates in career fairs, if the Sponsor is not accepting outside applicants into the apprenticeship program because it utilizes incumbent workers, then the Sponsor is only complying with a portion of its Affirmative Action Plan.
A motion to approve the program review, with the modification that a letter be sent to the Sponsor notifying them that the Equal Opportunity Plan should be amended and that the Sponsor provide follow-up to the Council within two Council meetings, was made by Mr. Wilford, seconded by Mr. Smalls, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya, Employer Representative Tasha Cornish, and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
Ironworkers Local No. 5 JATC (Pam Luby)– Request for approval of program review for a registered Sponsor with 5 or more Apprentices. (ITEM 24)
Ms. Luby presented a program review for Ironworkers Local No. 5 JATC and reviewed the findings of the program review. Ms. Luby stated that an in-person review was conducted on March 3, 2026. She reported that the Sponsor has been registered since 1981. Ms. Luby stated that all aspects of the apprenticeship program are well managed and that apprentice registrations, completions, and program records are current and up to date.
Ms. Luby reported that the Sponsor maintains an Affirmative Action Plan that exceeds its established goals; however, the program remains underrepresented with regard to female participation. She stated that the Sponsor currently has 164 active apprentices, including 99 minority apprentices and 6 female apprentices, with 55 active participating employers. Ms. Luby stated that all apprentices are being compensated in accordance with the approved wage progression contained in the Standards of Apprenticeship. Ms. Luby recommended that no further action be taken until the Sponsor's next two-year review.
A motion to approve this review was made by Mr. Shmelzer, seconded by Mr. Courtien, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish
were not present.)
Program Reviews (Fewer than 5 Apprentices)
Chairman Cavey said that Items 25 through 28 are program reviews with less than 5 Apprentices. He said that staff verified that program reviews were performed and programs were found to be conducted in a satisfactory manner, therefore, no Council action is required.
AMCO Metal Products, Inc. (Pam Luby)– Request for approval of program review for a registered Sponsor with fewer than 5 Apprentices. (ITEM 25)
No Council action required.
Dedicated Circuits, LLC (Coral Newland)– Request for approval of program review for a registered Sponsor with fewer than 5 Apprentices. (ITEM 26)
No Council action required.
Human Genome Services, Inc. (Coral Newland) - Request for approval of program review for a registered Sponsor with fewer than 5 Apprentices. (ITEM 27)
No Council action required.
Johnson Controls Fire Protection (Coral Newland) - Request for approval of program review for a registered Sponsor with fewer than 5 Apprentices. (ITEM 28)
No Council action required.
Provisional Reviews:
Chesapeake Caregivers Management Company, LLC (Pam Luby)
– Request for approval of provisional program review for a registered Sponsor with fewer than 5 Apprentices. (ITEM 29)
Ms. Luby stated that an in-person review was conducted on March 24, 2026. She reported that the Sponsor registered its apprenticeship program in January 2025 and currently has three approved occupations within the program: Geriatric Nursing Assistant, Maintenance Technician, and Cook.
Ms. Luby stated that the Sponsor currently has an active apprentice in the Geriatric Nursing Assistant occupation who is preparing to complete the program. She further reported that an additional apprentice is progressing successfully through the program.
A motion to approve this provisional review was made by Mr. Shmelzer, seconded by Ms. Durant, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
Cancellations
Chairman Cavey said that Item 30 is a request for voluntary cancellations and asked the Council to consider and vote on all of the items together.
Maryland Direct Support Professional Apprenticeship Program (Sheila Jackson)– Request for voluntary cancellation of Standards of Apprenticeship. (ITEM 30)
A motion to approve the cancellation was made by Mr. Wilford, seconded by Mr. Courtien, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
Other Business(Apprentice Registrations with Greater than 50% Credit or After-the-fact)
Caliber Collision (Jane Sinclair)– Request for registration of an Apprentice with over 50% credit granted for prior training. (ITEM 35)
Ms. Sinclair presented the request for registration of Apprentices receiving greater than 50 percent credit for prior work experience and training.
A motion to approve the registration of three Apprentices with over 50 percent credit granted for prior work experience and training was made by Mr. Wilford, seconded by Mr. Shmelzer, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
DMV Decon A, LLC aka BioOne (Aneta Lefterov) – Request for
registration of an Apprentice with after-the-fact completion granted for prior work experience and training. (ITEM 32)
Ms. Lefterov presented the request for registration of an Apprentice with over 50 percent credit granted for prior training and provided background information regarding the Apprentice's prior experience and training.
A motion to approve the registration of an Apprentice with over 50 percent credit granted for prior training was made by Mr. Shmelzer, seconded by Ms. Woo, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
King’s Kids Early Learning Center, LLC (Alicia Dennis) – Request for registration of an Apprentice with over 50% credit granted for prior work experience. (ITEM 33)
Ms. Dennis presented the request for registration of an Apprentice with over 50 percent credit granted for prior work experience and provided background information regarding the Apprentice’s previous experience. Ms. Dennis requested approval to grant advanced standing credit in excess of 50 percent for a registered apprentice in the occupation of Child Care Development Specialist. She stated that the request included credit for 2,004 hours of on-the-job training based upon documented prior experience and licensure within childcare settings, as well as partial completion of City of Laurel training completed prior to employment.
Ms. Dennis stated that all required documentation had been submitted and was on file. She respectfully requested the Council's consideration and approval of the advanced standing request.
A motion to approve the registration of an Apprentice with over 50 percent credit granted for prior work experience was made by Mr. Cavey, seconded by Ms. Anderson, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (Lynn Stone) – Request for registration of an Apprentice with over 50% credit granted for prior training. (ITEM 34)
Ms. Stone presented the request for registration of three apprentices with over 50 percent credit granted for prior work experience and training. She stated that the Sponsor requested approval of advanced standing credit in excess of 50 percent for three registered apprentices in the occupations of Electrician, HVAC Mechanic, and Forestry Technician. Ms. Stone provided background information regarding the requests and stated that all required documentation had been submitted for Council review.
A motion to approve the registration of three Apprentices with over 50 percent credit granted for prior work experience and training was made by Ms. Gilmore, seconded by Mr. Courtien, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
The Campaign for Historic Trades (Jane Sinclair) – Request for registration of an Apprentice with over 50% credit granted for prior work experience and training. (ITEM 35)
Ms. Sinclair presented the request for registration of an Apprentice with over 50 percent credit granted for prior training and provided background information regarding the Apprentice’s previous training.
A motion to approve the registration of an Apprentice with over 50 percent credit granted for prior training was made by Ms. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Cavey, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
Supplemental Agenda
Revision
(1) I.E.C. Chesapeake (Sheila Jackson) – Request for revision of Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan for the occupations of Electrician and Telecommunications Installer Technician, the registration of a new occupation of Electrical Power-Line Installers and Repairers, and the removal of HVAC/R from the program. (ITEM 1)
Ms. Jackson stated that she was joined by Mr. Grant Shmelzer, representing
I.E.C. Chesapeake, to request approval of revisions to the Standards of Apprenticeship and Affirmative Action Plan.
Ms. Jackson presented the request for modification of the Independent Electrical Contractors Chesapeake Standards of Apprenticeship. She stated that the occupations of Electrician and Telecommunications Technician would continue to be offered within the program; however, HVACR would no longer be available as an occupation and Electrical Power Line Installer and Repairer would be added as a new occupation.
Ms. Jackson stated that the Related Instruction for Electrician is provided by IEC Chesapeake and is administered through either a 100 percent hybrid model or virtual self-paced instruction with weekly instructor check-ins. The Related Instruction for Telecommunications Technician is provided by IEC Chesapeake and consists of 10 percent in-person instruction and 90 percent virtual instruction.
The Related Instruction for Electrical Power Line Installer and Repairer is provided through IEC Chesapeake utilizing Northwest Lineman College curriculum and consists of 25 percent in-person instruction and 75 percent live virtual instruction.
Ms. Jackson informed the Council that apprentices are responsible for the full cost of tuition and must provide their own electronic devices, such as a laptop or tablet, to participate in Related Instruction. She stated that employers may elect to enter into tuition reimbursement agreements with apprentices; however, those arrangements are not monitored or administered by IEC Chesapeake. She further stated that apprentices are paid on a progressive wage and fringe benefit schedule. The journeyworker wage rates are $32.00 per hour for Electrician,
$27.50 per hour for Telecommunications Technician, and $52.00 per hour for Electrical Power Line Installer and Repairer.
Ms. Woo asked about the mathematics and reading assessments required for applicants. Mr. Shmelzer responded that the assessments are provided at no cost; however, applicants are responsible for the application fee.
Ms. Woo also asked whether School-to-Apprenticeship applicants are required to obtain an apprentice license prior to employment and whether guidance is provided to applicants regarding the licensing requirement. Mr. MacLarion explained that apprentice licensure is required by law for individuals working in the electrical industry and that apprentices must possess the license to legally work in the occupation. He noted that the apprentice license fee is approximately $12.
Ms. Woo expressed concern regarding applicants obtaining a license prior to securing employment. Mr. MacLarion explained that the apprentice license remains valid throughout the industry and protects both the apprentice and employer from potential penalties associated with unlicensed work.
Ms. Woo also asked about tuition costs. Mr. Shmelzer stated that annual tuition costs for apprentices working for member contractors are approximately $2,800.
Discussion occurred regarding the revised wage progression language and the requirement that apprentices receive at least the applicable minimum wage. Council members discussed that an apprentice may not receive a wage increase until later periods of the apprenticeship depending upon the employer's wage structure.
Mr. Shmelzer recused himself from voting on the item. A motion to approve the revisions was made by Ms. Woo, seconded by Ms. Durant, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present. Employer Representative Grant Shmelzer abstained from voting.)
(Approval of a New AMP Employer/Occupation)
Chairman Cavey stated that Items 36-57 are all eligible employer requests for the Apprenticeship Maryland Program (AMP) and asked that the Council consider all of the items together. He asked the Council members if they had any questions, concerns, or remarks concerning any Youth Apprenticeship Items.
General Questions
Mr. Shmelzer and Ms. Woo requested clarification regarding the Patient Care Technician curriculum. The Council was advised that the primary distinction between the programs is the additional clinical externship and clinical rotation requirements.
Children’s Christian Center (Amy Belt) – Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Teacher Aide. (ITEM 36 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Chopz Salon (Laura Wright)– Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Cosmetologist. (ITEM 37 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Chung's MA III (Amy Belt)– Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Martial Arts Instructor. (ITEM 38 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Clarksburg Plumbing (Aneta Lefterov)– Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupations of Plumber and Marketing Specialist. (ITEM 39 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Foxfire Nursery LLC (Amy Belt)– Request for approval as an
eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Nursery Manager. (ITEM 40 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Garden-Warrior (Jacqueline Trieu)– Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Landscaping Technician. (ITEM 41 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Grimm Auto Works LLC (Amy Belt) – Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Auto Body Repair Technician. (ITEM 42 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Grounded Coffee LLC (Amy Belt)– Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Shift Manager. (ITEM 43 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Indian Lake Christian Camp (Amy Belt)– Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Parks and Recreation Manager. (ITEM 44 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Ironshore Diesel and Auto LLC (Alicia Dennis)–
Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Diesel Technician. (ITEM 45 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
J.A. Ripple Plumbing LLC (Laura Wright)– Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship
Maryland Program for the occupation of Plumber Gasfitter. (ITEM 46 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
JR Mechanical Services Inc. (Angela Harkness)–
Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of HVAC Technician. (ITEM 47 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Kay Services Inc. (Amy Belt)– Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupations of Social Media Specialist and Marketer. (ITEM 48 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Perry Hall Learning Center (Angela Harkness)– Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Teacher Aide. (ITEM 49 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Sliceology, LLC (Jennifer White) – Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Cosmetologist. (ITEM 50 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Starr Hydraulics LLC (Jacqueline Trieu) – Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Hydraulic Repairer. (ITEM 51 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Sterile Technique Phlebotomy and CPR/First Aid School (Angela Harkness) – Request for approval as an eligible Youth
Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupation of Phlebotomist. (ITEM 52 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Stratosphere Social (Teresa Mena) – Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupations of Line Cook and Sales/Marketing. (ITEM 53 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Susquehanna Labs (Amy Belt) – Request for approval as an eligible Youth Apprenticeship employer in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for the occupations of Engineering Technician and Marketing Support Specialist. (ITEM 54 – Youth Apprenticeship
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Charles County Public Schools (Laura Wright) – Request for approval of new Youth Apprenticeship occupations in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for Administrative Assistant and Natural Resource Technician. (ITEM 55 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
Meritus Medical Center, Inc. (Jennifer White) – Request for approval of new Youth Apprenticeship occupations in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for Certified Nursing Assistant and Nurse Aide. (ITEM 56 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
TidalHealth (Alicia Dennis) – Request for approval of new Youth Apprenticeship occupations in the Apprenticeship Maryland Program for Certified Nursing Assistant I and Certified Nursing Assistant II. (ITEM 57 – Youth Apprenticeship)
See Item 57 for Council vote.
A motion to approve the bundled items 36-57AMP employer and occupation requests was
made by Ms. Durant, seconded by Mr. Courtien, and approved. (Public Representative Beli Acharya; Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle; and Employer Representative Tasha Cornish were not present.)
Closing Remarks
The Chairman recognized Jennifer Griffin from the Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) and asked if she had any information to share with the Council. Ms. Griffin stated that she did not have any updates for the Council but that it was good to be present and attend the meeting.
The Chairman then asked if there was any other business to come before the Council. Hearing none, he requested a motion to adjourn. adjourn.
Adjournment
Ms. Woo made the motion to adjourn, Ms. Smalls seconded the motion, and the meeting was adjourned. (Public Representative Beli Acharya, Employer Representative Tasha Cornish, and Consultants Ellen Flowers-Fields, Jeanine Nagrod, Martin Knott, Jr., and Tracy Kyttle were not present.)
Respectfully Submitted,
Christopher D. MacLarion Secretary
Maryland Apprenticeship and Training Council
Select the minutes from the list below
- May 12, 2026
- March 10, 2026
- November 12, 2025
- September 9, 2025
- July 8, 2025
- May 13, 2025
- March 11, 2025
- January 14, 2025
- November 19, 2024
- September 10, 2024
- July 9, 2024
- May 14, 2024
- March 12, 2024
- January 9, 2024
- November 14, 2023
- September 23, 2023
- July 11, 2023
- May 16, 2023
- March 14, 2023
- January 10, 2023
- November 15, 2022
- September 20, 2022
- July 12, 2022
- May 10, 2022
- March 8, 2022
- January 11, 2022
- November 16, 2021
- September 14, 2021
- May 11, 2021
- March 9, 2021
- January 12, 2021
- November 10, 2020
- September 8, 2020
- July 14, 2020
- May 12, 2020
- March 10, 2020
- January 14, 2020
- November 12, 2019
- September 10, 2019
- July 9, 2019
- May 14, 2019
- March 12, 2019
- January 8, 2019
- November 13, 2018
- September 18, 2018
- July 10, 2018
- May 8, 2018
- March 13, 2018
- January 9, 2018
- November 14, 2017
- September 12, 2017
- July 11, 2017
- May 9, 2017
- January 10, 2017
- November 15, 2016
- September 13, 2016
- July 14, 2016
- May 26, 2016 Special Called Council Meeting
- May 10, 2016
- March 8, 2016
- January 12, 2016
- November 10, 2015